Where
is the fine line between an ad being offensive, or accepting? When I
first saw this advertisement of Bacon Lube, I was thoroughly disgusted by both the idea of bacon being erotic and how this may be socially unjust.
I thought it was trying to portray a woman as an animal, thereby
wrongly reinforcing mans' dominant gender role in society. I also thought that
because media has made meat a symbol of manliness, it was discriminating
its non-meat loving audience. Though that is not the case at all.
Through this ad not appealing visually to many audiences for both its
sexual humor, and meaty scent, this ad is encouraging and accepting a meat loving
audience.
This product was made by J&D Foods, a company that was created only five years ago. Their slogan literally is: "everything should taste like bacon" and they have carried this out in many silly products such as bacon lipbalm, bacconaise, bacon popcorn. Considering such a silly prowess for a company, I
had to ask myself, 'who would actually want to buy this?' For this ad,
it wasn’t about it’s main audience: the American people, but primarily it’s
meat loving demographic. In order to sell this product, this ad relies
on couples who are goofy, and kinky, and are craving for a meaty night together. Just because this lube has a bacon scent does not mean
it is creating stereotypes about men and meat. Likewise, seeing a woman with a pig snout doesn’t mean that she is
suddenly an animal that the man intends to subordinate. This advertisement is made primarily to put a new, silly spin on sex.
I
believe that this ad, no matter how disgusting, is actually
encouraging equality. With a lot of media
nowadays, it creates unfair stereotypes of men and women through
advertisements discriminating their opposite audiences. This media works at
the self-esteem of us individuals who aren’t the correct shape, or
aren’t pretty enough, in order to get us to buy their products. However,
with this product, it wouldn’t be affective to encourage such
discrimination because it is such a bizarre product. It also shows equality through this picture's choice in colors. Through making the picture black and white for everything except the bacon, race isn't a focus within this advertisement, but only the product is. Similarly, this advertisement effectively attracts it's audience through showing how sexually appealing a pig can be. Through the man looking so overwhelmed with just the scent of bacon, shows how effective and alluring the smell of bacon can be.
This
product also is a subtle statement in the progression of accepting others in
society. Although at first glance it is a joke, American people can observe that there are meat lovers who would buy
this product. Whether it be “manly men” who enjoy the scent of bacon, or
an erotic couple, putting this product on the market makes anyone who
sees it, aware of how liberal America is in terms of its censorship.
Having such liberties in selling erotic products improves society
because then society can learn of the many cultures and demographics
that are constantly forming throughout the world. Because America is a melting pot of many cultures and sub-cultures, allowing media to showcase controversial products spreads awareness and acceptance of these many demographics.
In
essence, Bacon Lube is a step in the right direction to a more
culturally accepting society. Through not discriminating genders, and
spreading awareness of many cultures, the media is in the right direction for equality. Just because a product looks controversial in that it has sexual connotations, and possible gender roles, doesn't mean that it is socially unjust.

Oh. My. God. This product. I'm somewhere between horror and amusement.
ReplyDeleteYou definitely picked a shocking and provocative ad. You analyzed it well; I especially liked how you discussed how this reflects our society. My only suggestion would be to pay more attention to other parts of your analysis; I just feel like you spent a lot of time picking apart the influence of our stereotypes on this ad and, while this is not a bad thing, it took away the opportunity to analyze other parts of this ad and discuss how it communicates this message.